- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Louisiana sticks to existing congressional district for 2026 midterms
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:42 am
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:42 am
quote:
Louisiana’s existing six congressional districts will be used for the 2026 midterm election after the U.S. Supreme Court did not rule in a case challenging their boundaries by the end of 2025.
State lawmakers convened for a special session in October to push back election deadlines one month, with Republicans hoping justices would issue a ruling before the year ended.
Had they made a decision on that timeline, the legislature was expected to hold another special session to redraw the districts, possibly eliminating one or both of Louisiana’s majority-Black seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Instead, the Supreme Court is expected to hand down a ruling during its usual late-spring release period.
State Sen. Caleb Kleinpeter, R-Port Allen, who co-sponsored legislation to change the 2026 election calendar to allow for a new round of redistricting, said in an interview Friday there were no plans to hold another special session or deviate from the existing map.
quote:
The case in question, Louisiana v. Callais, challenges the legality of a second majority-Black U.S. House district Republicans state lawmakers drew in 2024 in response to a federal court finding a 2022 version of the state’s congressional maps was unconstitutional. Louisiana has six seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, but just one favored a Black candidate before the redistricting process in a state where nearly a third of the population is Black.
quote:
State Attorney General Liz Murrill, who originally defended the 2024 version of the map, now argues race-conscious redistricting under Section 2 is no longer necessary to ensure fair racial representation and now violates the 14th and 15th amendments of the U.S. Constitution.
quote:
Beaullieu testified during a committee hearing there was no official forecast for when the decision would be issued. He also acknowledged to a reporter the election calendar changes he backed would become pointless if the Supreme Court doesn’t rule in time.
Qualifying for closed party primaries in the congressional races, scheduled for May 16, will take place Feb. 11-13. Any party runoffs that are needed will be held June 27, and the general election is set for Nov. 3.
LINK
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:45 am to ragincajun03
Which interestingly enough could result in a null outcome if the SCOTUS rules the districts are invalid/illegal.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:55 am to ragincajun03
Just some GOOD OLE BOYS
Never meaning no harm
Beats all you ever saw, been in trouble with the law since the day they were born…
Never meaning no harm
Beats all you ever saw, been in trouble with the law since the day they were born…
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:16 am to ragincajun03
Was it not alleged that the SC court rule next week and as long as there was a decision before the end of January, the new districts could be be used?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:21 am to ragincajun03
On local talk radio this morning in BR, Nancy Landry denied this and criticized the report. She said comments she made were taken out of context. She said they were preparing for all scenarios because they do not know when the decision will come down and how many voters will be impacted by the ruling. If a decision comes down and they can get new maps done, they will use them. Not sure what the projected time line is for decision.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:30 am to lsursb
quote:
On local talk radio this morning in BR, Nancy Landry denied this and criticized the report.
Good to hear. That district that was designed specifically for Cleo Fields should make the whole map invalid.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:33 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Cleo Fields
Without Jimmy B, that corrupt clown is on borrowed time
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:03 pm to ragincajun03
Republicans are dumbasses from state to state. Dems would change the district tomorrow, win the election and wait 4 years for the courts. meanwhile create havoc.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:19 pm to winkchance
Will be interesting to see if this actually happens as it is widely suspected that the Supreme Court will rule on this case Friday.
Back to top
5







