Started By
Message

re: Signing after Signing day

Posted on 2/12/09 at 7:37 pm to
Posted by Charlie Scene
Hollywood Undead
Member since Jan 2009
1004 posts
Posted on 2/12/09 at 7:37 pm to
I think thir should be a one week signing period. That gives recruits an extra visit if they need it. But these kids that want to wait until March need to be stopped.
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
20936 posts
Posted on 2/12/09 at 7:55 pm to
It must start to really wear down the coaches too...kissing up to 18 year olds all year, waiting for signing day, then they don't sign!! I think they should stop the day after signing day. I don't belive all this shite that these kids don't know where they are signing...most of them have a favorite team they support by the time they have started high school, and when seniors, they have ample time to decide on any visits to see if they possibly have a second choice that starts to look good, etc. I think it's all about 15 min. & then some...
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56941 posts
Posted on 2/12/09 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

I think thir should be a one week signing period. That gives recruits an extra visit if they need it. But these kids that want to wait until March need to be stopped.


why? nobody is harmed. Schools don't have to recruit them or offer a scholarship.
Posted by LSUDad
Still on the move
Member since May 2004
59051 posts
Posted on 2/13/09 at 2:19 am to
quote:

I think thir should be a one week signing period.


A week long signing Bash?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram