- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Alito stays lower court order blocking TX redistricting map
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:06 pm
Stays the order until the full court can rule:
Looking for an article. Headline from Bloomberg
Politico link
Looking for an article. Headline from Bloomberg
Politico link
quote:
Justice Samuel Alito temporarily restored the state’s new map — expected to net Republicans up to five seats in the 2026 midterms — while the Supreme Court weighs a lower court’s decision to toss that map altogether.
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:07 pm to bbvdd
Fine in CA
Not fine in TX or LA
Not fine in TX or LA
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:09 pm to bbvdd
So this means the map is no longer blocked right?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:18 pm to bbvdd
quote:
Stays the order until the full court can rule:
SCOTUS has already re-heard the Louisiana case right?
I wonder if Alito's order could be a glimpse into what the eventual ruling in that case will be
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:28 pm to bbvdd
quote:
Alito stays lower court order blocking TX redistricting map
Not surprising. The fact that lower court felt emboldened to continue hearing cases about this while SCOTUS is considering it was shocking. What a waste of taxpayer money.
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:36 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Not fine in TX or LA
Depends on how the legislature wrote the state law.
With enough signatures Missouri can make it a state initiative. The amendment wouldn’t be voted on until the fall of 2026, so if the amendment passes the map wouldn’t take effect until 2028.
The democrats have a good system to easily get enough legit signatures for it to be put on the 2026 ballot.
quote:
To get initiatives on the 2024 and 2026 general election ballots, the minimum number of signatures required is 170,215 for initiated constitutional amendments and 106,384 for initiated state statutes and veto referendums. These numbers were calculated through looking at voting totals in the six smallest congressional districts. If other districts are targeted for signature collection, the requirements will be higher.[1]
They only need around 18,000 signatures from each district and they will try to get at least double the amount needed. That means the new congressional map won’t take effect in Missouri until 2028 if the map passes.
The legalization of marijuana got over 385,000 and the abortion initiative got over 380,000. They only need 108,000
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:44 pm to rt3
quote:
I wonder if Alito's order could be a glimpse into what the eventual ruling in that case will be
Makes sense
SCOTUS has always steered clear of purely political gerrymandering - which is what this is.
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:08 pm to bbvdd
Hurry up with the racial districting case and the rest of this will be less impactfull.
Popular
Back to top
5








