- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NYC Mayor race: no I.D. required, and Zohran on top of ballot TWICE
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:43 pm
5
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:44 pm to ZIGG
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:45 pm to ZIGG
Dipshits lecting a communist muzz.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:49 pm to ZIGG
Should have taken a picture of the ballot.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:50 pm to 3down10
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:53 pm to ZIGG
quote:
No ID required
We are lost as a republic if this is allowed to persist.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:57 pm to ZIGG
Thanks.
Looks like the double name thing is just how they do it since it's multiple times.
Just seems like a dumb way to have a ballot.
Looks like the double name thing is just how they do it since it's multiple times.
Just seems like a dumb way to have a ballot.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:58 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
We are lost as a republic if this is allowed to persist.
It should be a top priority for republicans, but for some reason it's not.
At least we have it here in Florida.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:58 pm to 3down10
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:02 pm to ZIGG
I don’t know that I particularly like the way NYC does this, but it’s major and minor party noms at the top. Independents at the bottom. If multiple parties nominate you, you’re on there multiple times.
Sliwa would have been on there three times if he’d accepted the conservative party nomination.
Sliwa would have been on there three times if he’d accepted the conservative party nomination.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:51 pm to 3down10
Feels like he should have to split his vote and not just add up all his votes from 2 different parties. Why don’t candidates just form a bunch of random parties and get their names printed 10 times on the same ballot??
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:53 pm to ZIGG
Wow that is so dumb. Liberals just suck at everything
This post was edited on 11/3/25 at 11:55 pm
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:56 pm to MDTiger 13
quote:
Feels like he should have to split his vote and not just add up all his votes from 2 different parties. Why don’t candidates just form a bunch of random parties and get their names printed 10 times on the same ballot??
Yep, that's exactly what I was thinking. It's a stupid way to have a ballot and makes no sense. With all the space they are taking up, they could easily just have the candidate name once and then list all the so called parties they belong to.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 12:01 am to MDTiger 13
So to some extent that’s kind of what happened here. Sliwa formed a party around an issue important to him with the “Protect Animals” ballot line.
He’s a strange fellow, but I love him for that. What’s going on with cats and dogs in shelters around the country right now is appalling.
He’s a strange fellow, but I love him for that. What’s going on with cats and dogs in shelters around the country right now is appalling.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 12:15 am to MDTiger 13
FWIW, the first 4 lines A B C D are parties that have been around. And you can look down and see the Public Advocate, etc is organized on the same lines.
It’s after that you have new parties.
As I think about it, I can see a justification for giving historical parties ballot lines, even if they’re nominating a candidate already on the ballot. And they set up the ballot on lines rather than by candidate, listing all the parties nominating them.
Looks strange to my eyes but New Yorkers probably get it.
It’s after that you have new parties.
As I think about it, I can see a justification for giving historical parties ballot lines, even if they’re nominating a candidate already on the ballot. And they set up the ballot on lines rather than by candidate, listing all the parties nominating them.
Looks strange to my eyes but New Yorkers probably get it.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 12:16 am
Posted on 11/4/25 at 12:41 am to ZIGG
What is the "Democratic" party?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News