Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Judge bars unsupervised contact between Mayor Cantrell and Jeffrey Vappie

Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:36 pm
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
38042 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:36 pm
BULLYING {ON} OFF

quote:

A federal judge has barred Mayor LaToya Cantrell and co-defendant Jeffrey Vappie from contacting each other without an attorney present while an 18-count indictment hangs over them.

The ruling Friday from U.S. Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault amended Vappie's bond conditions. It came in response to a request from federal prosecutors who argued that Cantrell and Vappie, her former police bodyguard and alleged paramour, might continue "colluding" as they await a trial next year.


quote:

In court filings, Cantrell and Vappie both argued against the no-contact rule, saying they've each abided by their bond conditions and shouldn't be restrained any further.



The judge did Vappie a favor.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
24430 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:45 pm to
I would not need a judge to tell me to stay away from her.
Posted by GeauxGutsy
Member since Jul 2017
5849 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:57 pm to
Not a lot of talent in NO. Cantrell probably a 4.5.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23886 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 5:01 pm to
Do you honestly think that da Kween of New Orleans is gonna let that Cracka bitch tell her she can’t get her Vappie dick?

Sista puhleez!
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
9263 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Cantrell probably a 4.5


A 4.5???

I’m going to assume you’ve never seen a picture of her
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
13400 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 5:04 pm to
Colluding... or canoodling? Colloodling?
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
11388 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:36 pm to
Could the judge still bar contact if Jeffrey put a ring on it?

And wouldn’t that complicate the case in which they could talk to each other and their spousal communications would be privileged? It also wouldn’t bar the court from forcing them to testify against each other because their crimes were committed before they were married.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103104 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:38 pm to
Maybe 4.5 is the number of mixed drinks it would take to even approach her.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
11388 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Cantrell probably a 4.5.


You call this a 4.5.




I hate to see what qualifies for a 9 or 10.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram