- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Interesting Study concept: Teams that thrive after firing a coach vs. number that fail.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:29 am
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:29 am
I'm pushing 6 decades and it seems looking back it seems for every team that hires a winner, there's 10 that spend decades in the wilderness. Georgia post Dooley, Tennessee post Fulmer, Bama post Bear, Florida post Meyer, etc.
Would be interesting just to know for sure what the number really is of the chances of hiring a winner vs. setting the program back a decade or more. One of you young lads do your thesis on this and let us know.
Would be interesting just to know for sure what the number really is of the chances of hiring a winner vs. setting the program back a decade or more. One of you young lads do your thesis on this and let us know.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:35 am to SemperFiDawg
quote:
Georgia post Dooley, Tennessee post Fulmer, Bama post Bear, Florida post Meyer, etc
An old man retiring is not the same as getting fired for bad results.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:49 am to SemperFiDawg
We fired Dinardo - got Saban - NATTY!
We fired Miles - got O - NATTY!
We fired O - got BK - back to Step 1.
We fired BK - dunno but seems like LSU is batting .667 on this program.
We fired Miles - got O - NATTY!
We fired O - got BK - back to Step 1.
We fired BK - dunno but seems like LSU is batting .667 on this program.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:51 am to BEATIGER
LSU clearly has to be considered an outlier due to their success.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 11:08 am to BEATIGER
By firing Kelly you just reset the clock back another 4 years, minimum.
Not saying Kelly did not need to go.....I was against the hire in 21 but the realities are what they are. What hired guns is the new coach going to get at QB and at least half the O line?
Not saying Kelly did not need to go.....I was against the hire in 21 but the realities are what they are. What hired guns is the new coach going to get at QB and at least half the O line?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 11:26 am to SemperFiDawg
Because at the end of the day, only about 2-3 SEC teams will be happy with their season every year. Even if they all spent 100 million per year. So that leaves a lot of fanbases unhappy with the results. And the league is full of good programs and coaches. But the coaches know what they sign up for and get paid ridiculous amounts for it.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 11:37 am to SemperFiDawg
quote:
. Georgia post Dooley, Tennessee post Fulmer, Bama post Bear, Florida post Meyer, etc.
Only one of these coaches were fired
Posted on 10/27/25 at 11:42 am to BEATIGER
Unfortunately we also fired Mike archer and got curly Hallman and DiNardo. So yes we did our fair share of 12 years of floundering. We had a couple of good years but for the most part it was a dark period in LSU football history
Popular
Back to top
4





