- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tulsi responded to Obama calling Russiagate "a weak attempt at distraction"
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:07 am
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:07 am
8
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:10 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Tweets & media appearances, tweets & media appearances. Yawn.
Let’s see her build a case.
Let’s see her build a case.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:11 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Obama is nervous.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:13 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Let’s see her build a case.
She has, up to Blondi to do something with it.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:24 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Something that needs to be noted....shes using the tern TREASONOUS Conspiracy,,,,not Seditious.
No Statute of Limitations on Treason.
No Statute of Limitations on Treason.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:32 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
She has, up to Blondi to do something with it.
She’s built a narrative.
Blondi has no ammunition to work with.
People here have been hedging their bets with SOL since day one, but that doesn’t square with making an actual referral to DOJ.
There’s no SOL on what they’re claiming. They won’t bring charges because they don’t want to get humiliated in court.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:34 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
In full
quote:
BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard just FIRED BACK at Barack Hussein Obama saying the Trump-Russia conspiracy allegations against him are "a weak attempt at distraction" "President Obama's very carefully worded response that came from his office, again, deflects away from addressing any of the truth that was revealed." "They would have to admit and actually address the details of their complicity in this or their absolute failure in conducting the most basic responsibilities of, again, asking, where is this intelligence coming from? What are the sources? What proof do you have of this high-confidence assessment? Remember, John Brennan and James Clapper at the time assessed, and James Comey, with high confidence that Russia aspired to help Donald Trump win the election in 2016, when there was NO credible intelligence that actually reported that!" "The treasonous conspiracy that we have now released to the American people. The complicity, the deflection, and the silence of politicians, of the mainstream media, and of those directly implicated into this speaks VOLUMES."
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:10 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
There’s no SOL on what they’re claiming. They won’t bring charges because they don’t want to get humiliated in court.
Says the poster with zero legal acumen.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:21 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Says the poster with zero legal acumen.
Never claimed to have one.
I do however still have a functioning brain.
Your schtick is pretty pitiful BB.
There are some law experts on this board, but they don’t run around calling everyone counselor (even if the post is about economics or op eds) while regularly demonstrating lack of basic reading comprehension.
Competent folks don’t usually go out of their way to parade around their occupational history.
I’d believe you passed the bar & then maybe showed up to traffic court a few times or did a short stint as a public defender.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 10:28 am
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:29 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
DeathByTossDive225
You are a proven left-wing kook by your posting history, so nobody is going to care what you think or say.
That would be like trying to have a discussion with Hakeem Jeffries.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:35 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Let’s see her build a case
Building a case is up to the DOJ, not the DNI.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:35 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Thicc.
Me likey.
Me likey.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:36 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
You are a proven left-wing kook by your posting history, so nobody is going to care what you think or say.
That would be like trying to have a discussion with Hakeem Jeffries.
I’ve always been pretty ambivalent and borderline optimistic on tariffs & the economy.
I just don’t suckle Trump’s teet unconditionally or participate in red meat frenzies, which is enough to qualify as a left-wing kook by PT standards.
Not seeking your approval, just here to ensure facts are occasionally sprinkled into your circle jerk.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:37 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
DeathByTossDive225
Your "Black Jesus" is a crook and a fraud, boy. The next 3.5 years are going to be really tough on you.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:02 am to DeathByTossDive225
Hey dumbass, the DNI can't indict and prosecute people.
That is up to the DOJ, and she is handing them tons of info along with criminal referrals.
You need to shut up and go take a remedial civics class.
That is up to the DOJ, and she is handing them tons of info along with criminal referrals.
You need to shut up and go take a remedial civics class.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:29 am to tiggerfan02 2021
In order to do that he would have to remove the gay studies from his curriculum.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:32 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I love that Tulsi is the face for Trump on chasing these treason loving bastards down.
She's so hot...
She's so hot...
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:16 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
I’d believe you passed the bar & then maybe showed up to traffic court a few times or did a short stint as a public defender.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:18 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:20 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Let’s see her build a case.
Do what now?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News