- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Appeals court judge rebukes Supreme Court for deportation flight decision
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:18 pm
quote:
View all
Court Battles
Appeals court judge rebukes Supreme Court for deportation flight decision
by Zach Schonfeld - 05/21/25 9:10 AM ET
A federal appeals court judge appointed by President Trump rebuked the Supreme Court for blocking the administration from swiftly deporting a group of Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act.
“I write to state my sincere concerns about how the district judge as well as the President and other officials have been treated in this case,” U.S. Circuit Judge James Ho wrote in a concurring opinion published Tuesday.
“I worry that the disrespect they have been shown will not inspire continued respect for the judiciary, without which we cannot long function,” he continued.
Criticizing former Presidents Clinton, Obama and Biden, Ho in his seven-page opinion suggested the courts aren’t treating Trump with the same respect.
“I doubt that any court would deny any of those Presidents the right to express their views in any pending case to which they are a party, before issuing any ruling. Our current President deserves the same respect,” Ho wrote.
“We seem to have forgotten that this is a district court — not a Denny’s,” Ho wrote. “This is the first time I’ve ever heard anyone suggest that district judges have a duty to check their dockets at all hours of the night, just in case a party decides to file a motion.”
LINK
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:24 pm to BCreed1
quote:
We seem to have forgotten that this is a district court — not a Denny’s
WHATS UP SCOTUS?!?!?!
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:38 pm to BCreed1
We have the best Hos, don't we?
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:01 pm to BCreed1
He also razed them for the time limits compared to another case.
https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2025/05/20/this-is-a-district-courtnot-a-dennys-5th-circuit-responds-to-scotus-in-tda-case-and-hoo-boy-n2189368
quote:
At 12:48 p.m. on April 18, however, Petitioners “suddenly informed the court that they would file an appeal if the District Court did not act within 42 minutes, i.e., by 1:30 p.m.” Id.
quote:
Notably, the Justices themselves have expressed concerns about making decisions under far more forgiving time constraints than those demanded here.
Recall the emergency relief sought in Does 1-3 v. Mills, 142 S. Ct. 17 (2021). Members of the Court expressed concern about the “use [of] the emergency docket to force the Court” to “grant . . . extraordinary relief” “on a short fuse without benefit of full briefing.” Id. at 18 (Barrett, J., concurring in the denial of application for injunctive relief).
The amount of time considered too short in Does 1-3 was nine days.
Compared to 42 minutes, however, nine days is a lifetime to decide a motion.
So the district court reasonably assumed that the principle invoked in Does 1-3 to justify denying relief to law-abiding citizens concerned about their religious liberties in the COVID-19 era would likewise justify denying relief to illegal alien members of a foreign terrorist organization.
https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2025/05/20/this-is-a-district-courtnot-a-dennys-5th-circuit-responds-to-scotus-in-tda-case-and-hoo-boy-n2189368
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:30 pm to BCreed1
quote:Precisely
We seem to have forgotten that this is a district court
Popular
Back to top

4







