Started By
Message

It’s time…with the technology everywhere. AI strike zones are needed.

Posted on 5/3/25 at 3:59 pm
Posted by TOPAL
Member since Mar 2010
4814 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 3:59 pm
have the ump just for all other calls.
Posted by King BRLA
Member since Jan 2024
541 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:01 pm to
It’s almost comical but we have the technology to fix it.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
24502 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:06 pm to
This is why baseball is the most Dune sport... a highly regimented system that would logically be governed by machines if they weren't seen as an affront to sacred beliefs
Posted by Gonadballbarian
Member since Dec 2017
1053 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:15 pm to
I hate the need for this, but it might be time. To me it takes away from the purity of the game, though. This is much less of a problem in the major leagues, obviously.
Division one umpires get 200 to 500 a game. In the major league it's over 100 grand to almost a half a million annually.
Obviously the Lure to transition over to the major leagues is the biggest motivation there is to be great at what you do, but regardless, we might just need to have AI strike zones for all levels of baseball
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171903 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:19 pm to
We don't need AI to tell if a ball crosses through a box lmao. It's just basic ABS tech.

Edit: ABS not VAR
This post was edited on 5/3/25 at 4:21 pm
Posted by Tammany Tom
Mandeville
Member since Jun 2004
4394 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

To me it takes away from the purity of the game, though


I think the complete opposite. Having electronic strike zones makes the game far more pure. Every single game, no matter who’s calling it, each batter gets the same, identical strike zone. Each pitcher gets the same strike zone.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
34502 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:22 pm to
Yeah it should just signal the call to the ump and he’s just like an old fashioned announcer for those.
Posted by Lsutigerturner
Member since Dec 2016
6833 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:25 pm to
I don’t no much about baseball but isn’t why they do it is they want to allow for catchers to have a bigger effect on the game with I think what yall called framing. I thought that was what they don’t want to take away from
Posted by SouthernInsanity
Shadows of Death Valley
Member since Nov 2012
22649 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

To me it takes away from the purity of the game, though


Would you fire an employee that you know was costing you things in your job or if they were just failing to get it right? But hey shows up everyday... so do you keep him for the purity of never missing work??
Posted by Gonadballbarian
Member since Dec 2017
1053 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 5:06 pm to
If you're speaking of purity as in accuracy, then yes. And I'm not saying it's not needed. But I will miss a human being calling balls and strikes. That's the game we grew up watching.
Then there's a whole aspect of different umpires having different strike zones. I mean referees call the playoffs different in basketball for fouls. Some people like the human aspect
This post was edited on 5/3/25 at 5:12 pm
Posted by Gonadballbarian
Member since Dec 2017
1053 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 5:10 pm to
Well I'm not arguing against baseball moving to AI for calling balls & strikes. I think we should. But I'll miss seeing the human aspect
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
58672 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 5:54 pm to
I have always thought they could mount sensors to call balls and strikes. The only variable is sheer the batters knees and elbows are, and they could be outfitted with sensors to tell where those are located. You would still need an official there to call “hit batters” as well as governing the game.
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
10685 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 6:00 pm to
I'm a baseball purist but the SEC umpires ruin a great game.

I'm all far electronic balls/strikes.

Not just for accuracy but I'm afraid there's bias or even corruption in umpiring and electronic strike zone would mostly remedy this.
Posted by yakster
Member since Mar 2021
2558 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 6:03 pm to
The ump is not your employee. Bad analogy.
Posted by LSU Neil
Springfield
Member since Feb 2007
3012 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Yeah it should just signal the call to the ump and he’s just like an old fashioned announcer for those.


That is a great idea actually
Posted by LSU Neil
Springfield
Member since Feb 2007
3012 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

human aspect


Is subjective and not beyond reproach. They can be tampered with, they can have bias
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
34502 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

quote:Yeah it should just signal the call to the ump and he’s just like an old fashioned announcer for those.

That is a great idea actually

So the call result would get sent to each team and the ump so everyone knows what he’s calling is correct, and that’s it.
Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
10615 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:16 pm to
Been saying this for years. Not sure why they haven't done it. Unless they want to still control the outcome.
Posted by dolamite
st. mary parish
Member since Sep 2009
1045 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:22 pm to
You might be on to something right there.
Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
10615 posts
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

You might be on to something right there.


You think? LOL
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram