- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DOJ considers abandoning the defense of federal restrictions on gun silencers
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:09 am
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:09 am
LINK
quote:
The Justice Department is evaluating whether to defend the federal government’s restrictions on gun silencers that have been in place since the 1930s as part of President Donald Trump’s order to reconsider positions that could limit gun rights.
Silencers, also called suppressors, are tube-shaped devices that, when screwed into the muzzle of a gun, slow the decompression of gases that propel a bullet forward, thus reducing the “pop” sound of gunfire.
The devices are legal in 42 states but have been subject to strict federal restrictions since Prohibition-era gang violence. Under the National Firearms Act, buyers are required to submit fingerprints and a photograph, go through a background check and to pay a $200 tax – a steep price in the 1930s. If a person fails to pay the tax or register one of the devices, they could face prosecution.
The Justice Department has defended the law for decades, arguing that it doesn’t ban silencers but simply governs how a buyer can acquire one. Still, late last week, prosecutors requested a 30-day pause in the criminal case against a firearms dealer found with an unregistered silencer because “the Department of Justice is re-evaluating its litigation positions regarding silencers.”
The review is one of the efforts undertaken by DOJ since Trump ordered the federal government to re-evaluate its gun policies and tasked Attorney General Pam Bondi with re-evaluating all ongoing litigation that could restrict Americans’ gun rights.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:21 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Delete the AT eff while yer at it
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:28 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Good news but let’s see how it unfolds.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:11 am to lsufan1971
Great news, but for it to stick we will need legislation or the next democrat administration will reverse course again
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:29 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
the ATF/NFA pen pushers must be advocating for this.
ATF Agent: Director Patel, we can't keep up with demand. For every 100 applications we get out, there's another 1000 coming in!!!
Director Patel: Aight, we'll advocate to have them removed from the NFA.
Americans rejoice!!!!

ATF Agent: Director Patel, we can't keep up with demand. For every 100 applications we get out, there's another 1000 coming in!!!
Director Patel: Aight, we'll advocate to have them removed from the NFA.
Americans rejoice!!!!
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:49 pm to LoneStarTiger
quote:
we will need legislation or the next democrat administration will reverse course again
I wish more people would realize this. On all of these executive actions.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:52 pm to flvelo12
quote:
I wish more people would realize this. On all of these executive actions.
Buy as many as you can in that time frame and get grandfathered in
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:02 pm to spudz
quote:
Buy as many as you can in that time frame
I like the way your mind works.

quote:
and get grandfathered in
That didn't work so well w/ my pistol AR-15 and brace. Federal agencies have a tendency to change rules however they want to, whether the change is legal or not.

Popular
Back to top
