- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Traditional IRA bank fees
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:04 am
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:04 am
57 years old. ~$775k total retirement funds, $560k of which in a trad ira managed by a large bank charging 1.2% fee. Seems it’s plugged into a management algorithm (west end) and fund manager not really doing anything. Returned about 6% over last 3 years. Strongly considering pulling it and just buying treasuries and saving the fee. Welcome any suggestions/opinions.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:48 am to FlowMaster
quote:
57 years old. ~$775k total retirement funds, $560k of which in a trad ira managed by a large bank charging 1.2% fee. Seems it’s plugged into a management algorithm (west end) and fund manager not really doing anything. Returned about 6% over last 3 years. Strongly considering pulling it and just buying treasuries and saving the fee
Go talk to the bank before you do anything. Explain your concerns and see what they say.
People on the money talk are going to instinctively tell you to do it yourself, but no one understands your risk tolerance, financial plans, etc. if you’re unhappy with performance, tell your advisor. If you’re unhappy with the fee, tell your advisor. All of these things are negotiable.
ETA- and if you’d have dropped all your money in intermediate treasuries 3 years ago you’d have a lot less than you do today.
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 6:57 am
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:22 am to FlowMaster
1.2% is extremely high. Why are you opposed to saying the specific bank? That can matter a lot?
Yes I mean you could be with Vanguard, Schwab, etc and have fees and costs well under 0.5%.
But as said above without knowing your entire story that’s tough to judge.
Yes I mean you could be with Vanguard, Schwab, etc and have fees and costs well under 0.5%.
But as said above without knowing your entire story that’s tough to judge.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 11:46 am to baldona
quote:
1.2% is extremely high.
Relative to what? It’s high relative to do it yourself, sure.
I’ve seen advisory fees as high as 2% (which I do think is pretty outrageous regardless of service/performance/etc.), but it’s apples to oranges without knowing what’s included, total service and planning, etc.
I’m well aware that any fee is too high for this board of DIYers, but I’m not ready to objectively say 1.2% is too high universally without knowing more.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 12:35 pm to slackster
I thought standard was 1% AUM, decreasing with escalating assets. I'm willing to say 1.2% is too high without knowing more.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 3:03 pm to FlowMaster
quote:
Seems it’s plugged into a management algorithm (west end) and fund manager not really doing anything
At all the major brokerages you can get something like this for free with a roboadviser. You can then pay a little more for more services if you want. If you can't understand them, you probably don't need them.
Popular
Back to top
3






