- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did we talk about the FISA 702 ruling?
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:41 pm
Per ACLU:
LINK
Cato Institute:
LINK
quote:
In a long-awaited ruling in United States v. Hasbajrami, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York last night held that warrantless queries — or searches — conducted under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act violated the Fourth Amendment. The ruling is the first of its kind, and it follows years of public revelations about how Section 702 has been used by the government to conduct warrantless surveillance of Americans, including protesters, members of Congress, and journalists.
LINK
Cato Institute:
quote:
Federal Court Rules FISA Section 702 “Back Door” Searches Unconstitutional
LINK
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
6
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:42 pm to Bunk Moreland
Alito is going to retire before he has to rule on this one.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why?
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:43 pm to Bunk Moreland
Vance won't like this ruling.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:44 pm to Bunk Moreland
I am a big fan of this
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:45 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
In a long-awaited ruling in United States v. Hasbajrami, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
If the case had been U.S. v. Trump I guaranf*ckingtee you that the EDNY would have come down with exact opposite holding.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:45 pm to Jbird
quote:
Why?
He is one of the biggest "law and order" justices of my lifetime.
He's gotten quite political due to personal attacks (like Thomas) and likely sees this as a partisan issue.
He's going to have to choose between his historical stances and being political.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:46 pm to Bunk Moreland
Is this the part of fisa where they have one warrant and they can have unlimited scope and basically spy on anyone?
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:46 pm to MMauler
There is common ground with folks like the Squad on police state overreach. Embrace it, don't just write them off as terrorists.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
Ban bet on the retirement?
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:48 pm to momentoftruth87
I seem to recall if you get FISA'd, the machine can basically audit your internet history back to the beginning of time. But, yeah, I think you're referring to the skip/hop thing between people.
This post was edited on 1/23/25 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 1/23/25 at 8:50 pm to Bunk Moreland
Every government bureaucrat would like to have general warrant like the ones the Kings of England had where any functionary could go any where and search anyone or anything with out so much as a "by your leave."
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News