Started By
Message
locked post

Is Deshaun Ford from Opelousas a take with 105 scholarships?

Posted on 8/20/24 at 9:39 am
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35599 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 9:39 am
I want to be honest with you and tell you the only thing I know about him is what the board has said before.

He’s a sturdy back with some skill that offers a change up from holly . But also can play LB.

…..and that you dont want a La guy going out and making us pay for not offering.


Anding and Bradford are obvious. But with 105, it’s kind of easy tO take a big Rb that might be able to play LB.
Posted by fastlane
Member since Jul 2014
3552 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 9:42 am to
He’s more likely to land at Miami or Alabama.
Posted by Awesome All Day
Plaquemine, La
Member since Jul 2011
820 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 9:55 am to
If they have space and he has potential to play multiple positions, I don't see why not. After this season we'll only have 3 scholarship running backs on the roster (Durham, Holly, Jackson), and that's assuming Holly is able to return. If you add Ford to the current recruiting class, that'll give us 6 heading into the 2025 season. Unfortunately you always have to plan for injuries and/or transfers so I don't see why you wouldn't take an extra back with position versatility if you are able to make the numbers work.

I just watched his Hudl highlights and he runs like a mad man! I don't know anything about the level of competition he plays against, but he doesn't look slow for someone his size. He runs a little stiff so I can see why he's not rated higher, but he appears to be solid back if you need someone to push the pile.
This post was edited on 8/20/24 at 10:06 am
Posted by SEC Doctor
Member since Aug 2024
6677 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:08 am to
quote:

After this season we'll only have 3 scholarship running backs on the roster (Durham, Holly, Jackson),


And the two stud freshmen who are coming.
Posted by Awesome All Day
Plaquemine, La
Member since Jul 2011
820 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:13 am to
quote:

And the two stud freshmen who are coming.


Correct, I accounted for them in my post.
Posted by philly444
stuck in contraflow
Member since Nov 2008
11867 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:15 am to
I would take him. Whether he plays RB or LB, we could use him at either position
This post was edited on 8/20/24 at 10:16 am
Posted by Mr Clean
Power I-Formation
Member since Aug 2006
52584 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:20 am to
Article on Ford from early 2024 LINK

Opelousas preview (Advocate) LINK
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
53921 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:28 am to
I was very hopeful you'd be around to see this thread and provide your input.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35599 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:35 am to
quote:

He’s more likely to land at Miami or Alabama.


Per his desires or the fact that he was heading there due to 85 to offer?


Does 105 change that?
Posted by fastlane
Member since Jul 2014
3552 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Per his desires or the fact that he was heading there due to 85 to offer? Does 105 change that?


Publicly at multiple times he has stated these guys are his leaders. It’s also a game of see what he does and not what says. In that case, he’s visited those guys way more than us.

From what I understand, the case is he’s just too short for LB but not quite fast enough for RB.
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
70841 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:43 am to
I dont know if the staff has a fully fleshed out strategy for filling the 105.

In the end, 85 was already too many scholarships, you're never keeping anywhere close to 105 D1 level football players happy on 1 roster so I dont know what approach we end up taking just giving a handful of walk ons some schollies, take maybe 30-32ish freshmen and then fill out the rest with the transfer portal.

Like it makes no sense to have 7 or 8 scholarship RBs just because now you have 105 scholarships to fill.
This post was edited on 8/20/24 at 10:44 am
Posted by fastlane
Member since Jul 2014
3552 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Like it makes no sense to have 7 or 8 scholarship RBs just because now you have 105 scholarships to fill.


Right. You want to fill this with developmental positions like OL, Edge and DB.
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
15746 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:55 am to
Either way, outside Jackson, Durham, Berry, Holly and Lindsey are all lighter backs. We need to add another between the tackles runner that can grind yardage. If we don't get Ford, we still need one more big back.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35599 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 11:02 am to
quote:

In the end, 85 was already too many scholarships, you're never keeping anywhere close to 105 D1 level football players happy on 1 roster so I dont know what approach we end up taking just giving a handful of walk ons some schollies, take maybe 30-32ish freshmen and then fill out the rest with the transfer portal.


Do you think 105 will help the rich schools?

Could Texas afford 105 d-1 starters and keep them happy via cash? Granted playing time will be diminished but keeping more d-1 guys will benefit you in the 12 team playoff when more players will go down.


ETA, This is not a dis to LSU’s NIL. I am not even saying that our NIL is not healthy….. I am just thinking that the Texas schools have money to burn and they can do things others cannot.

And one of those things is being able to have rows of depth to cover for defenses getting gassed by end of fourth and putting fresh legs in. Or they can sustain injuries and put a guy 90% as capable as the starter he replaces.
This post was edited on 8/20/24 at 11:06 am
Posted by Mr Clean
Power I-Formation
Member since Aug 2006
52584 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I was very hopeful you'd be around to see this thread and provide your input.


I don't have much to add in regard to specific schools.

I asked at their picture day. They're keeping it close to the vest.

Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13120 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Right. You want to fill this with developmental positions like OL, Edge and DB.


These spots and all others. Also for those LA kids a position coach loves but is just below the take line in a perfect world. End of the day, while the big boys will gobble up kids that should go elsewhere to begin with, these are just spots traditionally used for walkons. Practice players. Kids like Josh Williams that reach the depth chart are rare. As this spring can attest, RB needs bodies for practice too.
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
70841 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Do you think 105 will help the rich schools?



I'm not sure it helps any 1 thing specifically school wise. I think it benefits walk ons who might be good enough for a mid-major or FCS/DII scholarship but decided to go to a big D1 school as a walk on, those guys will probably get D1 scholarships now way more often because theres that room there. I dont think theres more "talent" out there waiting to get scholarships, cant just create talent out of thin air.

Again I'd argue 85 scholarships was way too many to begin with. The transfer portal is INSANE every offseason with the number of guys jumping ship to try and go play elsewhere, the majority of them because they didnt get enough playing time where they were at in their mind.

I dont think any school is going to be paying what they perceive as the 100th best player on their scholarship roster any sort of life changing money via NIL because whats the point? You're going to be paying your starters, your backups who are playing occasionally. You get no value from cutting a $100k check to a 5th year senior who only plays some special teams occasionally (not as a punter/kicker/LS) and is 4th on the depth chart at his position.

Ultimately 95-98% of guys WANT to play, they are coming to a D1 school because they think they are good enough to play and a small NIL check wont keep them around anywhere when there's always somewhere else they can transfer to and play. You cant make the NFL if you never play and you know a ton of these kids think they have that potential in their future. I'd argue if you havent played much for 2 years at a school and have no much prospect of starting or playing significantly in year 3, you should transfer. Maybe some nuances to that, obviously I would not have wanted Nuss to transfer the year Daniels came in for instance then decided to come back for 1 more year on top of that....but overall most of those type of players should transfer if they want to play and not ride the pine forever.
This post was edited on 8/20/24 at 11:15 am
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
10504 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 11:31 am to
True, but one injury, one transfer, and one guy underperforming his ranking, ans you're back in the same boat
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
28072 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 12:24 pm to
My guess is that he'd rather be RB1 or RB2 in another class than RB3 in this one.

Those 105 scholarships are more going to be for the fringe takes in the class. Those that you wouldn't likely take on your board in a capped 25 recruit class.

Think of kids late in the game that show promising senior seasons that you have already been watching.
Posted by Underteaux
Member since Feb 2024
522 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

My guess is that he'd rather be RB1 or RB2 in another class than RB3 in this one.
Considering the transfer market comes with hyper-inflated NIL deals, it’s probably a palatable risk to try somewhere smaller, show out, then hope for a bid from a larger school later
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram