- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

So, has our military war-gamed the use of fighter jets against domestic citizens?
Posted on 6/11/24 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 6/11/24 at 2:22 pm
I'm talking about those who might decide to "take on government" as Joe referenced today.
Anyone privy to that, if so, or even just have a general notion of how exactly that would work logistically?
Anyone privy to that, if so, or even just have a general notion of how exactly that would work logistically?
Posted on 6/11/24 at 2:24 pm to Y.A. Tittle
No. And the officer level would have no idea to maintain them after a few hours of flying them
Posted on 6/11/24 at 2:53 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
So, has our military war-gamed the use of fighter jets against domestic citizens?
Considering Ukraine has been using Cessna’s filled with car bombs as suicide drones against Russian bombers, I don’t think this would go very well for the govt.
Having endless amounts of cheap nuisance weapons will always prevail over having a few sophisticated systems.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 2:57 pm to MTNviewTiger
quote:
Considering Ukraine has been using Cessna’s filled with car bombs as suicide drones against Russian bombers, I don’t think this would go very well for the govt.
Having endless amounts of cheap nuisance weapons will always prevail over having a few sophisticated systems.
Including a population of 333,000,000 people who have a will to live.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:04 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Based on some videos from when I was a kid where bombers were targeting like monuments and fighters local neighborhoods and just convenient local landmarks, I would not be surprised if some NGO "thinktank" hasn't wargamed it for the government.
Back when it was filmed I'm sure it was just a convenience thing or showing the camera crew how it's done (demo tape?). There was no intent behind it other maybe general targeting practice.
Back when it was filmed I'm sure it was just a convenience thing or showing the camera crew how it's done (demo tape?). There was no intent behind it other maybe general targeting practice.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:05 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I don't remember the source, but I thought there was a wargame in which the military had to be used against American citizens and the results were so catastrophic that they hoped it would never happen.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:09 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Part of the logic for building the federal interstate system originally was for aircraft landing options
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:19 pm to Y.A. Tittle
The rank and file military leans heavily to the right and even the moderate Dem voters are rural types who have a beer with their neighbor, support America first, etc.
It's very unlikely they would turn on the populace no matter how much some bitter old Marxist in the Pentagon wants it to happen. They would be more likely to join their golf and beer buddies in fighting AGAINST a tyrannical government, paycheck be damned.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:24 pm to AUFANATL
I know some military folks and I've been told that they would follow orders from the president to the letter, no questions asked. If those orders entailed taking out American citizens on American soil, those orders may not be received.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:35 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
So, has our military war-gamed the use of fighter jets against domestic citizens?
Very likely, but those pilots are also domestic citizens. It's all well and good for the brass to LARP that they are "quelling dissention" (or whatever), it's a whole other thing to expect the grunts in the field, air and water to obediently declare war on their friends, family and neighbors.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:38 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Moving onto imaginary victim scenarios?
Aren't you victim enough in reality all day from .....everything ?
Aren't you victim enough in reality all day from .....everything ?
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:38 pm to LSUSkip
Our commitment is to the Constitution, not the President. There would be a percentage blindly following the President’s orders but a majority of those would be paper pushers and probably wouldn’t last long
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:41 pm to Y.A. Tittle
The military doesn't have enough fighters to repress a mass revolt. I have no plan to answer your question, but I'm not worried.... we'd figure it out. There are more of us than them.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:42 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
Moving onto imaginary victim scenarios?
Aren't you victim enough in reality all day from .....everything ?
I'll be honest. It's not something I ever really pondered until your president started discussing it. This is like the third time he's brought it up, so I'm just sort of curious as to what exactly it is he's envisioning in this hypothetical he seemingly can't keep talking about.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 3:45 pm to Bard
Base housing in many areas are considered soft targets
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:05 pm to Jbird
Base housing in many areas is already compromised due to black mold.
This post was edited on 6/11/24 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:21 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Yes and they've lost every single time. Over half the military would defect. Bases in conservative states would be taken over and a war would bring DC to it's knees.
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:22 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
I know some military folks and I've been told that they would follow orders from the president to the letter,
bullshite our oath is to the Constitution not some jackass in the white house.
Popular
Back to top


25





