- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How was “If”?
Posted on 5/31/24 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 5/31/24 at 6:08 pm
Kids want to see it this weekend.
Any good?
Any good?
7
Posted on 5/31/24 at 6:14 pm to CBandits82
It was iffy.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 8:35 pm to CBandits82
Took my 5 year old, she was too young the vast majority of the movie went over her head…but she giggled at the big purple monster and the fart jokes
The movie itself is light hearted movie but has a lot of adult themes (illness/hospitals, death, nursing homes, loss of youth, etc)
I’m also dumb and didn’t realize IF stood for “imaginary friends”
The movie itself is light hearted movie but has a lot of adult themes (illness/hospitals, death, nursing homes, loss of youth, etc)
I’m also dumb and didn’t realize IF stood for “imaginary friends”
This post was edited on 6/1/24 at 7:13 am
Posted on 5/31/24 at 8:54 pm to Eighteen
I wonder if Garfield is better?
Posted on 5/31/24 at 10:39 pm to CBandits82
It was good but not for kids under 14 to get the actual plot
Posted on 5/31/24 at 10:48 pm to Eighteen
quote:
I’m also dumb and didn’t realize IF stood for “invisible friends
Imaginary*
Posted on 5/31/24 at 10:50 pm to tigerfan84
quote:
wonder if Garfield is better?
Some parts were good. Definitely quite a good amount of filler. Ving Rhames was the highlight for me.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 11:08 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
quote:
It was good but not for kids under 14 to get the actual plot
My 9 year old understood it perfectly
Thought it was a good little movie. It’s probably not as funny/silly as you would think OP. More of a just a sweet movie.
Posted on 6/1/24 at 5:43 am to CBandits82
My 7 year old daughter enjoyed it. Not gonna lie I got teary eyed at one point which is rare
Posted on 6/1/24 at 6:51 am to Rooco
I did as well. I thought it had a lot of heart. My 6 year old won’t stop talking about it.
Posted on 6/1/24 at 8:14 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
quote:
It was good but not for kids under 14 to get the actual plot
Isn’t an imaginary friend something younger kids tend to have? I certainly had a child’s imagination when I was younger, but I don’t recall having an imaginary friend.
d * By the time I was in my early teen years I was thinking about boobs.
This post was edited on 6/1/24 at 8:17 am
Posted on 6/1/24 at 8:51 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Isn’t an imaginary friend something younger kids tend to have?
but the plot is more about growing up and losing imagination/hope not really just a funny movie about imaginary friends (which is what I was expecting)
my young daughter laughed and sat through the whole movie and liked it, but the plot/message requires you to not be a kid anymore to understand
Posted on 6/1/24 at 9:44 am to Eighteen
Not worth theater prices and they missed a H-U-G-E opportunity to show Blue, Walt, Coco or any of the Fosters IF in the retirement home. 
How can you have a movie about a Home for abandoned imaginary friends and not include a single IF from the GOAT IF foster home???
Fail
How can you have a movie about a Home for abandoned imaginary friends and not include a single IF from the GOAT IF foster home???
Fail
Posted on 6/1/24 at 3:36 pm to tigerfan84
quote:
wonder if Garfield is better?
As someone who’s seen both in the last few days, I assure you it’s not.
A huge piece of shite.
Posted on 6/1/24 at 5:50 pm to CBandits82
This movie was terrible .
It was slow as hell and extremely heavy handed. The beginning is brutal.
It felt like just a bunch of scenes spliced together with no coherent idea.
It wasn’t funny at all.
Huge miss.
. It was slow as hell and extremely heavy handed. The beginning is brutal.
It felt like just a bunch of scenes spliced together with no coherent idea.
It wasn’t funny at all.
Huge miss.
Posted on 6/1/24 at 8:38 pm to CBandits82
Took my 6 y/o grandson. I absolutely loved it. The majority of the movie was definitely over his head but there were a few part that got some laughs out of him.
I honestly don’t even think it’s a childrens movie. Not that it’s inappropriate or anything. Maybe preteen girls would be the best kid demographic. I think it’s a movie for older adults. It really hits you in the feels. Definitely recommend as it is a very well done movie.
I honestly don’t even think it’s a childrens movie. Not that it’s inappropriate or anything. Maybe preteen girls would be the best kid demographic. I think it’s a movie for older adults. It really hits you in the feels. Definitely recommend as it is a very well done movie.
Posted on 6/1/24 at 11:48 pm to Kingshakabooboo
My 9 yr old daughter liked it. She pretty much likes every movie she sees at a theater.
Posted on 6/1/24 at 11:55 pm to CBandits82
Ff
Posted on 7/11/24 at 8:39 pm to Kingshakabooboo
signed up for MGM+ last night for this movie and it did not disappoint.
was a really good film, and it does hit you in the feels. Aunt Petunia doesn't look like she has aged from Harry Potter.
the introducing Brad Pitt as Dennis the invisible IF was a clever play from Deadpool 2.
was a really good film, and it does hit you in the feels. Aunt Petunia doesn't look like she has aged from Harry Potter.
the introducing Brad Pitt as Dennis the invisible IF was a clever play from Deadpool 2.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News