Started By
Message

re: It's Still Kiddie Porn Even if it's AI Generated - Wisconsin Arrest

Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:31 pm to
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
8455 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:31 pm to
As much as I think anyone who watches AI kiddie porn should be shot, I don’t understand how art which doesn’t use real humans can be illegal.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124927 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

As much as I think anyone who watches AI kiddie porn should be shot, I don’t understand how art which doesn’t use real humans can be illegal.



It would fall under the same category as if a human drew it, no?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425788 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

As much as I think anyone who watches AI kiddie porn should be shot, I don’t understand how art which doesn’t use real humans can be illegal.


There is Supreme Court precednet on this from 20+ years ago

quote:

The court ruled the “virtual pornography” law violated free speech rights. The ruling is a blow to the Justice Department, which in March launched “Operation Candyman,” designed to crackdown on Internet-based child pornography.

The 1996 law addressed advanced computer imaging technology enabling the manipulation of non-sexual images of children into images of them engaging in sex acts. Under the law, producing or selling such pornography was punishable by up to 15 years in prison, while possession was punishable by up to five years.

Pornographers and mainstream filmmakers are hailing the ruling as a victory. Critics had said that such a wide ban could make it a crime to depict simulated sex scenes, such as those in the movies “Traffic” and “Lolita.”
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram