Started By
Message

re: Clark: Pels open to BI extension, but not at max

Posted on 5/12/24 at 8:50 am to
Posted by Split2874
Mandeville
Member since Jul 2012
2478 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 8:50 am to
It would have to be 2 things. The right $$ but also has to completely buy in and be the #2 guy.

I think we were kind of seeing it before he got hurt. But when he came back not so much.

This biggest issue I have with BI is how long it takes for him to come back from an injury. Not just the time away from the court , it is how long for his game to come back once he has been out .

BI checks all the boxes to be a great #2, but it just has not happened
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96891 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 8:52 am to
I see this as PR to handle trade value.

I don’t see BI taking less than the max or wanting to buy into what the team needs, given how he blew off the offense we were supposed to implement.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34493 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 11:19 am to
quote:

I think we were kind of seeing it before he got hurt. But when he came back not so much.

If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times. The parts of BI's game that most of you all hate are 100% part of being asked to play lead guard. When he came back, Zion got hurt and he was asked yet again to shift to point-Ingram.
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
6864 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

think we were kind of seeing it before he got hurt. But when he came back not so much.


I agree with the first part of your statement. Who was he supposed to defer to when Zion got hurt??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram