Started By
Message

re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:54 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96659 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Throw left Millazo’s hand before the runner got back in the baseline….interfering with his throwing lane to first
Excelt he isn’t in his throwing lane to first. And that was made extremely clear when the ball sailed right of the damn bag and the runner still wasn’t near the ball

If he was in milazzos throwing lane the ball would have smoked the runner
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 1:56 pm
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2530 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

he isn’t in his throwing lane to first


Yes, he is. Even more egregiously so than the other examples provided. That’s abundantly clear for those willing to be objective.

I’m done lol.!The quote “never cast your pearls to swine” applies well here. You guys can believe whatever you want.
I honestly hope all of you have a wonderful Saturday and we whoop some arse tonight.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram