re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

And to make it even more clear

The runner re entered the lane before any contact with Jones. So, the contact at that point does not matter because there was no previous interference

quote:

---

However, it is not required for the runner to be within the runners lane the entire time up to 1st base. The runner may enter the lane at the 50’ mark, the 60’ mark or even the 80’ mark as long as both feet have established themselves within the lane, and no interference with the throw or catch has occurred up to this point in time.

---

Proof he had re-entered the lane before contact

[/img]

The rules are very clear here. The runner re-established himself in the lane before the collision. Try to deny it with the picture above. You can’t. You can be a man and admit you were wrong, or whine like a child