- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 9:05 am to ramchallenge
Posted on 5/11/24 at 9:05 am to ramchallenge
Please explain how the throw was interfered with
Milazzos throw took this path crossing in front of the runner all without hitting the runner. It’s empirical proof the runner didn’t interfere with the throw. Because the center of the bag and left of the bag is even more open then going right of it
If his throw would have crossed behind the runner due to him blocking first or hit the runner y’all would have an argument. But it didn’t.
Milazzos throw took this path crossing in front of the runner all without hitting the runner. It’s empirical proof the runner didn’t interfere with the throw. Because the center of the bag and left of the bag is even more open then going right of it
If his throw would have crossed behind the runner due to him blocking first or hit the runner y’all would have an argument. But it didn’t.
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 9:06 am
1
Posted on 5/11/24 at 9:16 am to lsupride87
The rule, as I read it, simply says, there does NOT need to be contact with anyone or anything for the rule to be called. Regarding the last play, your line does not show the true story as the picture is at an angle.
From the way I read the Omaha explanation, the fact that the runner is inside the foul line, beyond the halfway mark and the fact that the fielder needed to make the throw on THAT SIDE of the bag, regardless of where the ball ends up, the call should be made.
Nevertheless, that inning during the 2 out time period perfectly sums up our season. When our veteran players are not playing their best (Tanks, Milazzo, Herring, Jones), we lose.
From the way I read the Omaha explanation, the fact that the runner is inside the foul line, beyond the halfway mark and the fact that the fielder needed to make the throw on THAT SIDE of the bag, regardless of where the ball ends up, the call should be made.
Nevertheless, that inning during the 2 out time period perfectly sums up our season. When our veteran players are not playing their best (Tanks, Milazzo, Herring, Jones), we lose.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News