Started By
Message

re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:06 am to
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
28069 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:06 am to
quote:

It isn’t false
I’m sorry but it is. If the rule is to prevent people from running inside the line it would be called hundreds of times every week.

ETA: From your own link
quote:

A runner who runs up the grass to 1st base (illegal), but doesn’t interfere with the fielder receiving the ball at 1st is NOT guilty of Runner’s Lane Interference.
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 8:10 am
Posted by L S Usetheforce
Member since Jun 2004
22806 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:09 am to
I’m sorry but if the 1st baseman and the runner make contact and the person has run inside the foul line…. It’s an out.
Posted by L S Usetheforce
Member since Jun 2004
22806 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:10 am to
No one is talking about the run. We are talking about the contact with the 1st baseman based off the run.
Posted by SmoothBox
Member since May 2023
819 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 9:53 am to
quote:

I’m sorry but it is. If the rule is to prevent people from running inside the line it would be called hundreds of times every week.


Try per day.
Posted by Tblock
Oklahoma
Member since Jun 2021
1013 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:56 pm to
He could have held the ball and been better off than he was throwing it away.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram