- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:06 am to L S Usetheforce
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:06 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:I’m sorry but it is. If the rule is to prevent people from running inside the line it would be called hundreds of times every week.
It isn’t false
ETA: From your own link
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
quote:
A runner who runs up the grass to 1st base (illegal), but doesn’t interfere with the fielder receiving the ball at 1st is NOT guilty of Runner’s Lane Interference.
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 8:10 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:09 am to MOT
I’m sorry but if the 1st baseman and the runner make contact and the person has run inside the foul line…. It’s an out.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:10 am to MOT
No one is talking about the run. We are talking about the contact with the 1st baseman based off the run.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 9:53 am to MOT
quote:
I’m sorry but it is. If the rule is to prevent people from running inside the line it would be called hundreds of times every week.
Try per day.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:56 pm to MOT
He could have held the ball and been better off than he was throwing it away.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)