- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted on 5/10/24 at 10:03 pm to LSU316
Posted on 5/10/24 at 10:03 pm to LSU316
quote:
Now somebody said earlier he was on the infield grass at one point which makes it a more egregious no call…..but based on that still shot even though by letter of law it could be called it should surprise no one that it’s not.
See how close his right foot is there, his left was in the grass prior.
That being said I immediately said there is no way Birmingham, ALABAMA is going to overturn that call.
This post was edited on 5/10/24 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 5/10/24 at 10:05 pm to JJ27
quote:
See how close his right foot is there, his right was in the grass prior.
Dude. His right foot never was near the grass
Posted on 5/10/24 at 10:06 pm to JJ27
So Milazzo fielded the ball inside the line and the runner being inside the line caused Milazzo to throw the ball outside?
We would have an argument had he jerked it to the left to “avoid the runner who was illegally out of the line”.
We would have an argument had he jerked it to the left to “avoid the runner who was illegally out of the line”.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:59 am to JJ27
The ball took this path and never hit the runner. Explain how the runner interfered with the throw?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News