Started By
Message

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted on 5/23/24 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14710 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 1:08 pm to
Yeah, I don’t see Collins as a negative asset, didn’t see him as one in Atlanta and I was hoping we would trade for him to be our closing 5 then.

37% on 3’s, 8.5 rebounds, 1 blocked shot, that’s the exact type of closing 5 we’ve been begging for next to Zion.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
18148 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Yeah, I don’t see Collins as a negative asset, didn’t see him as one in Atlanta and I was hoping we would trade for him to be our closing 5 then.

37% on 3’s, 8.5 rebounds, 1 blocked shot, that’s the exact type of closing 5 we’ve been begging for next to Zion.


Yeah, Collins may or may not be a negative asset in terms of salary, but in terms of his play on the court, I think he's a clear upgrade over Larry.

And Kessler doesn't offer much offensively in the halfcourt, but he can be a vertical threat and is the guy we've wanted defensively for shotblocking and rebounding. And who knows? Maybe Fred Vinson can teach him to shoot.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram