- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:23 am to ronricks
quote:
Hyperbole. You seem not to understand it.
So having Chinese employees = fraud in your little pea sized brain?
The place we are now is outlined in my post at the top of the page. Anything else you are doing is straw man to escape what is actually an interesting set of facts that we should all be interested in further developing.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:24 am to ronricks
quote:
Hyperbole. You seem not to understand it.
The statement you made was objectively idiotic. You clearly have no idea how many closely held (some being very large) companies there are in this country with zero Chinese employees. You clearly don’t have the mental ability to think outside of your very limited scope. Likely due to your complete ignorance and lack of intellectual capacity.
quote:
So having Chinese employees = fraud in your little pea sized brain?
I have offered no opinion on that matter. I simply pointed out your complete idiocy.
I do find it interesting that the CEO allegedly wanted to conceal that. If true, why do you think that is?
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 8:25 am
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:50 am to ronricks
quote:
So having Chinese employees = fraud in your little pea sized brain?
That's not what anyone here is saying at all, you stupid TDS frick.
Address the facts laid out in response above:
1) They have employees in their Canadian office involved in US elections;
2) Some of those employees are foreign nationals who aren't even Canadian foreign nationals;
3) The Canadian office had access to the election infrastructure on election day; and
4) The CEO identified the above as something they should conceal.
You think there's no reason to question this? This is not suspicious? Of course it's not to you because you're fine with the election being stolen to get rid of your mean stepdaddy, OMB.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)