Started By
Message

re: Beatles or Stones?

Posted on 5/10/24 at 4:47 pm to
Posted by OWLFAN86
The OT has made me richer
Member since Jun 2004
177102 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

then they morphed into solo careers that made it clear all 4 members were huge talents in their own right, nit just as a collective.

See part of my argument for the Stones as the greater band
individually the Beatles had better careers


but as a band, the Stones achieved more as a group
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33738 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

but as a band, the Stones achieved more as a group
Is that really true? In the past 40 years, which Stones tunes are you big on? I would assume "Mixed Emotions" would have to be in there. And that one is...embarrassing.

I get the longevity as a live act and going through the motions of nominally releasing new material to carry on the road. But come on. It's the same shite over and over. I'll agree that the Stones are the better touring band.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram