- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cannon sets motions on selective prosecution; appointment of SC; scope of prosecution team
Posted on 5/8/24 at 10:59 am to WPBTiger
Posted on 5/8/24 at 10:59 am to WPBTiger
Curious, if Cannon find reasonable evidence of illegality in the prosecution or fraud against the court, does she have a power available to appoint a special master with powers to investigate the prosecutions actions?
1
Posted on 5/8/24 at 11:13 am to cajunangelle
quote:
someone check Weissmanns X acct.
Twitter melts to Cannon's rulings have generally been "bought and paid for just like SCOTUS!"
Posted on 5/8/24 at 11:35 am to tigerfan 64
quote:
Slo must be in court.
He probably keeps posting when the other side is talking.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 11:46 am to Strannix
quote:
Jack Smith is a documented fricking dumbass
It’s why they selected him. He doesn’t give a shite about breaking rules to get his man. Never mind that he gets bitch-slapped on appeal, none of this is actually about convicting Trump, anyway. It’s about election interference.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 11:49 am to PsychTiger
quote:
He probably keeps posting when the other side is talking.
I cornered him on that once. He never flat-out admitted it, but he danced anround it, more or less implying that’s exactly what he does.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 12:13 pm to fwtex
quote:
Curious, if Cannon find reasonable evidence of illegality in the prosecution or fraud against the court, does she have a power available to appoint a special master with powers to investigate the prosecutions actions?
Judge Emmet Sullivan appointed a special counsel to investigate the DOJ.
LINK
quote:
Judge Sullivan is the judge who held federal prosecutors in contempt, dismissed an unjust indictment against a United States Senator, and publicly excoriated the Department of Justice. He also had the moral conviction, courage and gumption to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the Justice Department and the individual prosecutors.
quote:
In the Stevens case, Judge Sullivan publicly upbraided the government lawyers before an overflow courtroom, “In nearly 25 years on the bench, I’ve never seen anything approaching the mishandling and misconduct that I’ve seen in this case. . . . When the government does not meet its obligations to turn over evidence, the system falters.”
Judge Sullivan was taking the extraordinary step of appointing a special prosecutor. He chose highly respected DC attorney Henry Schuelke III to investigate the prosecutors for possible criminal charges. The judge ordered the department to preserve all of its files, electronic correspondence—everything—and cooperate fully in the investigation, including providing Schuelke access to investigative files and all witnesses.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 12:18 pm to Godfather1
I can't even imagine posting that much, and I'm creeping up on 100K. 
Posted on 5/8/24 at 12:55 pm to VOR
quote:So having a hearing on obvious problematic pre-trial issues is incompetence and bias?
Nonsense. But the judge is incompetent and biased, so maybe they just think it’s worth a shot.
Maybe it’s you. 
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News