- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ancient civilizations. Y or N?
Posted on 5/5/24 at 5:23 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Posted on 5/5/24 at 5:23 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:You heard wrong.
I've heard Graham obliterated the other guy
quote:I guarantee all of your faves have. He's basically the father of alt history grifting, and was the most outspoken alt history theorist regarding the pyramids.
Sichin? Again, no idea. Never heard of / don't follow him
quote:
there are a bunch of free thinkers
quote:Yeah? Like what?
who ask very basic and relevant questions regarding all sorts of ancient monuments that "™" doesn't address
quote:Researchers long ago proved that the Egyptians had the ability to build the pyramids, and all historical evidence has indicated they were built during the 4th dynasty.
doesn't address. It's just "a bunch of slaves and some sort of super strong magical rope" that no one can replicate and oh yeah, also an array of tools that we can't find ANY evidence of existing. And the rock pounding and copper tools don't cut granite with anywhere near the precision needed on a large-scale project.
But you don't know any of that, because you don't care. All you do is listen to people's alt history theories and take their word for it. You're doing it right now. You parrot the accusation that 'the scientific establishment' is too locked into their orthodoxy to even entertain alt history theories, but that's actually what you are doing.
And what the frick is this "™" thing you keep doing? Do you think existing research is like some kind of corporation or something? Like they're all 'in on it' together? No, dude. The ones with the biggest money interests are the alt history grifters.
Posted on 5/5/24 at 5:36 pm to blueboy
quote:
Researchers long ago proved that the Egyptians had the ability to build the pyramids,
No, they didn't. This is the same type of energy as 'the science is settled' and 'cOviD cONspIrAcy' garbage.
This is why, in part, the Great Pyramids are so mind bending. We don't know how they were built, or specifically why.
Now, I don't buy the "to harness energy" from the air or some nonsense. Others fall into that camp, but not me.
Gobekli Tepe and other locations really have tipped established understandings on its head.
quote:
quote:
who ask very basic and relevant questions regarding all sorts of ancient monuments that "™" doesn't address
Yeah? Like what?
The Schist disc.
The 'sarcophagi' of the Serapeum.
The head of the Sphynx. ( and whatever the heck is beneath it)
Look, I know there are 'accepted, official sounding explanations' for these things, but I don't buy them at face value. Some are just laughable.
This post was edited on 5/5/24 at 5:37 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News