Started By
Message

re: Pucker up your buttholes, IRS to jack up audits

Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:19 pm to
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26505 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:19 pm to
As I've said before, 45% flat tax on all income over 50K. And before you scoff and dismiss this as "off your rocker", such levels of taxation are commonplace in Europe and possibly other developed countries.

Since everyone wants their hands in the govt coffers, we need to make sure those coffers are funded, and social programs are fully payed for.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49043 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 4:57 am to
quote:

As I've said before, 45% flat tax on all income over 50K. And before you scoff and dismiss this as "off your rocker", such levels of taxation are commonplace in Europe and possibly other developed countries.


You are an insane person. That isn’t taxing the rich. That destroys the lower middle class. The rich are already approaching that. All this does is prove to all of us you’re a poor.

That being said. Your insane proposal doesn’t address the question I asked. What percentage of the burden should “the rich” pay?
This post was edited on 5/5/24 at 4:58 am
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14930 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 6:26 am to
quote:

As I've said before, 45% flat tax on all income over 50K. And before you scoff and dismiss this as "off your rocker", such levels of taxation are commonplace in Europe and possibly other developed countries.


Like who? Belgium? Yeah, you'll looooove the tax burden placed on labor vs capital in that country.

You like inefficiency? Google "trous autoroute belgique" and let me know what you think of their road tax.
This post was edited on 5/5/24 at 6:27 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram