Started By
Message

re: Why have churches started allowing gay preachers?

Posted on 5/12/24 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
734 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

No, you don't understand his analysis. He argues that the Bible condemns some same sex sexual activity, but, not the kind of same- sex sexual activity that exists in a loving Gay Marriage.

Yes, I do. What he’s doing is called eisegesis , which is reading one’s own biases into the text- when it is not what the text says. Scripture interprets scripture- meaning that when there is a question of interpretation in a particular verse- we weigh that verse against the other verses that deal with the same topic. This is the benefit of having scripture as the ultimate source of authority. Everything thing that Rust Cohle (RC ) is spouting is nonsensical heresy that is easily debunked by a faithful exegesis of scripture. This is the benefit of Protestantism- we are free to disagree with and rebuke (and will be held accountable to God if we don’t) any/all teachings that are in clear contradiction of the well established interpretation of scripture by the early church.

quote:

I'm not going to comment on how "Bible Alone" leads to these kinds of problems, because what I'm after here in this thread is to read an Official UMC analysis of this new interpretation of Scripture. We have already discussed "Bible Alone" in a dozen other threads. No need to do so here.

Please, spare us the “holier than thou” rhetoric. Your behavior in the majority of these threads is detestable. You complain, incessantly, about “Catholic bashing,” yet here you are, completely unprovoked- attacking Protestants- Protestants that I will not defend, because they are intentionally taking the Word of God out of context to suit their own sinful desires.

Where I see an opportunity for RC’s and Pros to come together to defend the infallible Word of God- you see an opportunity to start a fight. Very interesting.

What’s more interesting, is that you are always in lockstep agreement with atheists, and now heretics, as long as it serves your purpose of dividing the church.

Apologies, Rust. This post was intended for Champagne. Though, I will say that your views on this topic are in clear contradiction to a faithful and consistent exegesis of scripture.
This post was edited on 5/12/24 at 2:31 pm
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48676 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

completely unprovoked- attacking Protestants-


It is regrettable that you view intellectual discourse and rigorous analysis as an attack.

I simply place Protestant Theology on the witness stand and subject it to vigorous Cross-Examination. I maintain that it is unable to withstand such Cross Examination. Why does this anger you? You are too emotional.

Now, the facts are clear. The Methodists have embraced Gay Preachers, Gay Sex, Gay Marriage proudly, officially and without shame. What is also clear is that this denomination is a mainline Protestant denomination whose creed makes it clear that they are a Bible Alone/Faith Alone denomination.

It stands to reason that the Methodists have applied their rules of Bible Alone to this Gay Sex issue and they have concluded that the Holy Spirit has inspired them into reaching this interpretation of Holy Scripture.

Is this not a common thing in Protestantism, though? Aren't there always new off-shoots and new variations being created in Protestantism?

Where have I told a lie? Where did I attack anybody? If I say that this new Methodist theology is flawed, don't you agree with me? Yes.

Why are you attacking these fine Methodists?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram