Started By
Message

re: WSJ: Wall Street Has Spent Billions Buying Homes. A Crackdown Is Looming.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:15 pm to
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33656 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:15 pm to
quote:


I never have dug into that 9% number much to see how true it is but that is what I have seen reported.

I know in my line of work, we have what we call "zombie" houses that we have had in our inventory to manage for banks. Some we carry for years vs the 18 months or so that we typically cycle through.

I am also not sure how many of those are AirBNB/STRs but I am sure it's a large number.
But in the case of "zombie" houses, wouldn't we WANT someone with actual money to come in and get them back into the mainstream inventory? On top of relieving the huge shortage of SFH we have, it would serve to improve neighborhoods plagued by such.

I honestly believe all of this is much ado about nothing. The Blackstones of the world are going to own some portfolios of homes. Who cares? Also, home ownership is not for everyone - and certainly not for everyone at ALL times of their lives.

The #1 way to get the middle class involved (as per your preference, which I agree with) is to address the shortage of dwelling units, presently estimated to be 3-4 million. Almost everything else is window dressing. Prices simply aren't going to go down materially with such limited supply.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167645 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

But in the case of "zombie" houses, wouldn't we WANT someone with actual money to come in and get them back into the mainstream inventory?



Yea but the issue is it's not that simple because there are a myriad of reasons as to why they become zombie houses in the first place. Location, legal issues, Chinese drywall, etc

quote:

is to address the shortage of dwelling units, presently estimated to be 3-4 million


Yes but to do that you also need to stop Blackstone (Glad you got it right because Blackrock doesn't buy SFHs) from doing what they did in Houston when they bought 100 DSLD homes before they were even built.

I think the rise in activity from institutional investors into SFHs is worth monitoring but I think it's more of a local market issue. It Atlanta is having an issue with it (which they are) then let GA pass laws.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram