- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:36 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:36 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Is it?
This is going to get circular quickly
Perhaps go back and read insistences that the "Constitution says" certain things and we can square your "circular" in a quick minute.
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:38 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Perhaps go back and read insistences that the "Constitution says" certain things and we can square your "circular" in a quick minute.
I don't even know what you're talking about frankly, at least not relative to my posts. To the extent I used that phrase at all ITT, it was earlier in the thread when Robin Masters was woefully and demonstrably wrong about the impeachment judgment clause.
But then again, I'm not the one arguing that the impeachment clauses in the Constitution differentiate between POTUS and other impeachable officers--when it doesn't--simply because I want it to differentiate between them, as you are.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 4:43 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News