- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:41 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:41 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
However, as a trial would significantly undermine the president's ability to do his job, (contradistinct from the coequals judicial hierarchical structure, or that of the legislative branch) a trial could therefore hamper the country. So the chance that SCOTUS would simply lump findings in with some generic Judicial Branch treatment is remote to nonexistent.
What does this have to do with impeachment, though?
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You are arguing the POTUS can be tried while in office. You cited treatment of someone in the Judiciary as precedently indicative of how courts would regard a POTUS in identical circumstances. It seems a comparatively vacuous citing to me.
What does this have to do with impeachment, though?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News