- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:26 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:26 pm to Robin Masters
quote:But, but, but, but ... that implies a different treatment for the POTUS vs a no-name federal judge??? Oh my. How totally unexpected.
Alexander Hamilton again from the top rope:
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:45 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
But, but, but, but ... that implies a different treatment for the POTUS
Federalist 77 is titled
quote:
The Appointing Power Continued and Other Powers of the Executive Considered
The entire article is about the President. It implies no difference in application of the Constitution's plain language. It's just only focused on one specific branch.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News