- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 1:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/29/24 at 1:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:A litany of things, as did Roberts' absence from the J6 charade trial.
What else could it imply?
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:03 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
A litany of things, as did Roberts' absence from the J6 charade trial.
And which of those removes the President from the same Constitutional analysis of any other person to which the clause applies, and which Constitutional clause specifically makes this distinction?
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
A litany of things
Such as?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News