- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:39 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:39 pm to boosiebadazz
Posting that case made things real quiet.
I thank Robin Masters for the biggest self-own on the poli board in some time, for linking it (thinking it supported his side).
I mean I found the case example, but had no idea the actual ruling was so strong for my side (even my Double Jeopardy argument).
I thank Robin Masters for the biggest self-own on the poli board in some time, for linking it (thinking it supported his side).
I mean I found the case example, but had no idea the actual ruling was so strong for my side (even my Double Jeopardy argument).
3
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
I thought Robin Masters was legitimately in good faith and confused the other night. I had no idea he was this viciously stupid.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
thank Robin Masters for the biggest self-own on the poli board in some time, for linking it (thinking it supported his side).
I posted it knowing full well what it said. The reason was because the attorneys who won the case made the same argument I was making. An argument you seemed to be treating as ludicrous.
Constitutional scholars agree with me
Alexander Hamilton agrees with me.
If the USSC agreed with you they wouldn’t be hearing the case.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Posting that case made things real quiet.
And the cert denial is found at 103 S.Ct. 1188.
But let’s ignore actual cases that have been litigated by the highest courts in the land. A law professor wrote a law review article!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News