Started By
Message

re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:23 am to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30110 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Again, and? That just argues my point. You embarrassed yourself on this point this weekend. Do you really want round 2?


It says no such thing. And you’ve just been owned by an actual lawyer, judge and constitutional law scholar. Enjoy your bag of dicks. Wish I could stick around to watch you eat them but I have people who need me. Unlike you apparently.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424688 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:28 am to
quote:

And you’ve just been owned by an actual lawyer, judge and constitutional law scholar.

Clearly you did NOT read that article.

Even the article states every federal appeals court who has ruled on this, ruled the way I said.

Also, his paper is only about state court prosecutions of a sitting President.

That article has nothing to do with this thread (discussing a federal prosecution of a person who is not currently President).

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram