- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:20 am to frogtown
quote:
The Cares Act didn't address mail in voting. No references it it at all. That was done at the state level.
quote:
Yes it did. It gave the states millions to expand it. It was talked about on this board repeatedly.
Which section of the bill discusses it? And even if the bill does discuss it, do you think it has the power to change state laws?
This post was edited on 4/28/24 at 10:21 am
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:20 am to BBONDS25
quote:
You moron. You have been asked at least two yes or no questions directly.
I anwered.
"Stolen election" is very different than climate change.
When you hand the keys to the Kingdom over to Democrats, its not a conspiracy anymore
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:22 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I anwered. "Stolen election" is very different than climate change. When you hand the keys to the Kingdom over to Democrats, its not a conspiracy anymore
bullshite. You gave an OMB response. It’s all you can do. I followed it up with a specific yes or no question and you ignored it. You don’t have the capacity to engage at any level above OMB.
This post was edited on 4/28/24 at 10:23 am
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:23 am to BBONDS25
quote:
quote:
Which section of the bill discusses it?
It gave them funding. The number was $400 million I believe. The laws were already on the books but they could not have done it without $$$.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:23 am to BBONDS25
quote:
You gave an OMB response.
No, youre just having a horrible victim complex.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:26 am to frogtown
quote:
It gave them funding. The number was $400 million I believe. The laws were already on the books but they could not have done it without $$$.
I understand the motivation, what I asked for specifically is the section of the Act that discusses it as you claim.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:26 am to BBONDS25
quote:
I understand the motivation,
Donny's populism will cost you dearly in the years to come.
Maybe you will know why when it happens now.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:27 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No, youre just having a horrible victim complex.
Let’s try one more time:
1). Do you support the section of the TCJA that doubles the estate tax exemption? Yes or no?
2). Is it your opinion that there were not fraudulent and or illegal votes counted in the 2020 election? Yes or no?
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:28 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Donny's populism will cost you dearly in the years to come. Maybe you will know why when it happens now.
OMB. We know. It literally all you ever say.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:30 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Donny's populism will cost you dearly in the years to come. Maybe you will know why when it happens now.
Can you elaborate on this. Maybe provide some details. I'm willing to listen.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:30 am to BBONDS25
quote:
1). Do you support the section of the TCJA that doubles the estate tax exemption? Yes or no?
IF spending were cut accordingly, absolutely.
If spending were added, frick no.
This is called Modern Monetary Theory regardless of how often you pretend it doesnt exist.
quote:
Modern monetary theory or modern money theory (MMT) is a heterodox[1] macroeconomic theory that describes currency as a public monopoly and unemployment as evidence that a currency monopolist is overly restricting the supply of the financial assets needed to pay taxes and satisfy savings desires.[2][3] According to MMT, governments do not need to worry about accumulating debt in and of itself since they create new money by using fiscal policy in order to pay interest. MMT argues that the primary risk once the economy reaches full employment is inflation, which acts as the only constraint on spending. MMT also argues that inflation can be addressed by increasing taxes across the economy to reduce the spending capacity of the private sector.[4][5]
Bonds, why has inflation risen so dramatically? Just the basic answer.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:30 am to BBONDS25
We know there was voter fraud, Donnie and Crack Mike proved it in court with the data packets.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:32 am to Damone
quote:
We know there was voter fraud, Donnie and Crack Mike proved it in court with the data packets.
Your ignorance of the cases determining illegal votes were counted does not negate their existence. It just means you’re ignorant.
You probably need to take a break after being proven to be a groomer this am.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:32 am to RiverCityTider
quote:
Can you elaborate on this. Maybe provide some details. I'm willing to listen.
Trump says he can get rid of debt by expanding the economy. Hes lying to you
They are going to raise taxes on the middle class. Youre already paying for 2020 through inflation right now. So, through inflation and taxes, we will pay back any "benefits" we have received.
Trumps economic plans are worthless. Whoever come after him and Biden will inherit a huge frickin mess.
This post was edited on 4/28/24 at 10:34 am
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:33 am to BBONDS25
quote:
I understand the motivation, what I asked for specifically is the section of the Act that discusses it as you claim.
I told you they expanded it with additional funding. They made it easier to ballot harvest, Some states increased the number of drop boxes. Some mailed out absentee/mail in ballot applications to all eligible voters. How did they get the $$$ to do this? Cares Act.
That money should have never been in the bill. You are too stupid to realize that.
Here we are in 2020 trying to stop it.
mail in ballot funding
This post was edited on 4/28/24 at 10:46 am
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:34 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
IF spending were cut accordingly, absolutely. If spending were added, frick no.
The question wasn’t a hypothetical. We know that the spending was. So I’ll ask again. It doesn’t require a Wikipedia copy paste. It simply requires a yes or no.
Do you support the portion of the 2017 TCJA that doubled the estate tax exemption? Yes or no?
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:35 am to Damone
Any system that allows mass mail in voting without chain of custody and scrupulous ID checks and signature verification is fraud waiting to happen.
Isn't that obvious?
Isn't that obvious?
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:35 am to RiverCityTider
If Populists are everything you say there are, why do they hate conservatives so much?
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:36 am to BBONDS25
quote:
The question wasn’t a hypothetical.
I gave you your answer. Do the math and figure it out yourself this time.
Do you want pictures?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News