- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LA. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of St. George Incorporators
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:00 am to udtiger
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:00 am to udtiger
quote:
The upside of this is these positions (majority and dissent) are so rigid, the chances of a grant of rehearing are negligible. But I am sure the anti-SG people will ask for one to delay this even further.
Who has standing?
Based on the appellate case, all but Lamont Cole were dumped.
Based on the SC ruling, Cole was dumped.
It would have to be someone within St George with standing and several other qualifications. And it can’t be MOP because she was already dumped IIRC.
2
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:07 am to teke184
I can’t imagine them ruling, only to grant a rehearing,
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:13 am to teke184
This is a case where I see both sides lose.
BR loses a major tax base, which could be the final nail in the coffin as it heads to Jackson, MS status.
The folks I’ve spoken with who led the St. George initiative are naive clowns who have no idea what they are getting into.
BR loses a major tax base, which could be the final nail in the coffin as it heads to Jackson, MS status.
The folks I’ve spoken with who led the St. George initiative are naive clowns who have no idea what they are getting into.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News