Started By
Message

re: LA. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of St. George Incorporators

Posted on 4/27/24 at 7:43 am to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99212 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 7:43 am to
quote:

How about the three jackasses that were willing to set this crazy president by voting against it. They literally hate everything about this country, the rule of law and the constitution. They are no better than the mayor and the lower court idiots. Be careful who you vote for going forward. Even if you were opposed to St. George, it was a legal and legitimate election, and it should scare the hell out of everybody. That’s so many people were willing to overturn it, Especially people in power


Griffin didn't surprise me.

Crichton did.

Weimer has been a major disappointment, but based on his questioning during the oral argument, I was not surprised by his dissent.

The upside of this is these positions (majority and dissent) are so rigid, the chances of a grant of rehearing are negligible. But I am sure the anti-SG people will ask for one to delay this even further.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96456 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:00 am to
quote:

The upside of this is these positions (majority and dissent) are so rigid, the chances of a grant of rehearing are negligible. But I am sure the anti-SG people will ask for one to delay this even further.


Who has standing?

Based on the appellate case, all but Lamont Cole were dumped.

Based on the SC ruling, Cole was dumped.


It would have to be someone within St George with standing and several other qualifications. And it can’t be MOP because she was already dumped IIRC.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram