Started By
Message

re: LA. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of St. George Incorporators

Posted on 4/26/24 at 6:09 pm to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96902 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

She is directly responsible for all of this


In multiple senses.

She was part of the bloc in the Senate that killed ISD funding for St George, then told them to form a city.

Then when she got elected she did such a fricking godawful job that the petition got enough signatures and won a vote.


And instead of working with St George, she spent years fricking with them in court and not setting aside the tax money in question into escrow.



BR is going to end up in the hole by tens of millions, if not more, just in back revenue for St George and she has been wishing in one hand and shitting in the other to try and block the incorporation.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
5789 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

And instead of working with St George, she spent years fricking with them in court and not setting aside the tax money in question into escrow.


Was setting aside sales tax money collected in StG still required after Broome’s partners in crime ruled against StG before appeal to state Supreme Court?





Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57592 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

BR is going to end up in the hole by tens of millions, if not more, just in back revenue for St George and she has been wishing in one hand and shitting in the other to try and block the incorporation.


SWB's voice was literally shaking in her presser this afternoon. She seemed completely shocked "her side" lost; I'm sure she's been told this case was a slam dunk in her favor.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram