re: Trump’s lawyers enter crimes committed by other presidents that were not charged

The fact that there were "official" advertised meetings of the other electors could be enough to suffice. It was not as though these fools were doing it in the dark prior to official certification in the states..

The documents case is where he has the greatest exposure. The "insurrection"and RICO are pretty weak overall.....I mean, you are telling Trump that he's not allowed to challenge something that he believes to be challengeable and Smith's assertion is that it is an illegal scheme when election law is somewhat unclear on the issue. Smith would have done better to outwardly suggest that Trump tried to insight insurrection. If you buy his assertion, all of it, then you start getting into free speech rights, Smith's denials notwithstanding in the indictment.

Bragg's case is a twisted mess. If you have to do both sides of the Glenn Beck chalkboard to explain how you get to being even close to a crime, your case is not even a house of cards.

Beat Trump at the ballot box, it's the only way to be rid of him.