Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity

Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:29 am to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30189 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:29 am to
quote:

was "convicted" by the Senate. He was not convicted by the jury.


So your example of a federal judge not having immunity is a federal judge who was acquitted.

I actually feel bad for you.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425838 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:50 am to
quote:

So your example of a federal judge not having immunity is a federal judge who was acquitted.

The question is the process, not immunity. Immunity isn't really specifically applicable to this discussion.

If a conviction in the Senate, following impeachment, is required (based on your colon theory) to permit criminal prosecution, how was Hastings tried criminally first?

Are you now going to accept that a conviction in the Senate has no bearing on related criminal prosecution?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram