- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Official act is using the executive legally, which Trump did. He had his DOJ investigate. Notice he's not being prosecuted for that or even accused of anything for that.
Did the prosecution list the predicate acts in this indictment? Have you considered those? Are any of those official acts?
Is speaking to the American people about a possible fraudulent election not an official act?
1
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:07 pm to moneyg
quote:
Official act is using the executive legally
I don't think an executive action has to be technically legal to be an "official act" within the purview of immunity.
It just has to be an act relating to the official duties of the president.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News