- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:49 pm to Tasseo
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:49 pm to Tasseo
Gorsuch made the obvious point that every single candidate in every single election makes decisions that can be construed to be both in his personal interest and his official capacity. And that to allow his political opponents to analyze and criminalize his motives selectively is ridiculous.
To which the twink, and SFP hero Michael Breeden, attorney for special counsel, responded that their motives as prosecutors here, are pure and above reproach. The government would NEVER use lawfare to consolidate power and destroy those who stand in the way, you see. Not the Democrats. No never.
To which the twink, and SFP hero Michael Breeden, attorney for special counsel, responded that their motives as prosecutors here, are pure and above reproach. The government would NEVER use lawfare to consolidate power and destroy those who stand in the way, you see. Not the Democrats. No never.
3
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:51 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Gorsuch made the obvious point that every single candidate in every single election makes decisions that can be construed to be both in his personal interest and his official capacity. And that to allow his political opponents to analyze and criminalize his motives selectively is ridiculous.
So could an incumbent President running for re-election violate campaign finance law without worry during that election? Is that private or official?
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:25 pm to Lsupimp
The tectonic plate shift here is the DOJ wanting case by case authority to control the president rather than a simple blanket rule. Should the supremes endorse then ,, they will have created a new, more than equal branch of govt, that will last for the next hundred years. The DOJ , a bureaucracy will be the dominant branch. Elections no longer matter
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:53 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
To which the twink, and SFP hero Michael Breeden, attorney for special counsel, responded that their motives as prosecutors here, are pure and above reproach. The government would NEVER use lawfare to consolidate power and destroy those who stand in the way, you see. Not the Democrats. No never.
dont pay any attention to what we do, just listen to what we say
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News