Started By
Message

re: Would you support government or Christian’s in the United States?

Posted on 4/23/24 at 12:21 pm to
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
1881 posts
Posted on 4/23/24 at 12:21 pm to
PS,
You might find this interesting. Switching gears a little because if I made a new thread it would be deleted or anchored.

Have you ever thought Genesis 19:24 sounded funny? Why does it say the LORD twice. Seems very awkward and redundant.
quote:

Then the LORD rained on Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven

I believe one of those “LORDs”, probably the second one, was originally “Elohim”.

Then look at Amos 4:11. The LORD is speaking, uses “I” in the first person and then references “God” in the third person. God here in Hebrew is Elohim. YHWH compares what he personally did to what Elohim did.
quote:

I overthrew you, as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah, And you were like a firebrand snatched from a blaze; Yet you have not returned to Me,” declares the LORD.


Compare to Deut 32:8-9. I know I’ve made the argument before but this is relevant. See how it reads that the LORD (YHWH) is one of the sons of God (Elohim) who is giving the LORD his inheritance. You can’t inherit something from oneself.
quote:

8When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he divided mankind, he fixed the borders of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God. 9But the LORD’s portion is his people, Jacob his allotted heritage.


Then you have 1 Cor 8:6. God - Theos - is Elhohim in the OT. Lord - Kyrios - is YHWH in the OT.
quote:

yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.


Paul wasn’t the only one who thought this way. Clement of Rome held the same views, and wanted to reiterate that the LORD Kyrios and God Theos were separate beings and both were important.
1 Clem 29:2
quote:

For thus it is written: When the Most High divided the nations, when He dispersed the sons of Adam, He fixed the boundaries of the nations according to the number of the angels of God. His people Jacob became the portion of the Lord, and Israel the measurement of His inheritance.


Why was this so important? It wasn’t heretical at all. There was one God and one Lord. The Bible literally never ever states that YHWH is the only deity. YHWH is constantly compared to the other deities and judges them - it just says no other deity is as badass and special as YHWH. It’s propaganda- why else would YHWH be jealous of them if they weren’t his peers? Nevertheless, people who read the passages and ignore the references to the other gods and cherry pick verses like this:

Isaiah 47:10
quote:

You felt secure in your wickedness; you said, “No one sees me”; your wisdom and your knowledge led you astray, and you said in your heart, “I am, and there is no one besides me.”


Have to come to grips with language such as this. Now, Nineveh wasn’t the only city in existence. This is simply a boast of propaganda. A “boast of incomparability” as the late Dr. Michael Heiser puts it.
quote:

This is the exultant city that lived securely, that said in her heart, “I am, and there is no one else.” What a desolation she has become, a lair for wild beasts! Everyone who passes by her hisses and shakes his fist.


If Isaiah literally means that YHWH is the only deity, then you’d have to acknowledge Nineveh was the only city in existence. The same literally Hebrew is used in both passages word for literal Hebrew word in the same order.

Ever heard of Philo of Alexandria? Lots have been written about him but he also expressed the “two powers of heaven” argument, and was a Jew, not a Christian. He lived right before the alleged time of Jesus. Paul and Philo’s lives overlapped.

Christianity didn’t come from rabbinic Judaism. It came from a Judaism that believed in multiple deities, one being an invisible spirit and one being a being that had human form but was divine. Philo believed God formed man in the image of YHWH. John doesn’t contradict the OT when he says no one has ever seen God - because he’s talking about Elohim or Theos. The deity wrestling with Jacob was YHWH. Philo believed all things were made by Elohim and all things were made through his agent YHWH. That’s precisely was Paul believed about Theos and Kyrios. And that’s why Jesus is never ever once stated to be the son of Kyrios… because he IS Kyrios. He’s the son of Theos.

ETA: then if you argue that Theos and Kyrios, aka Elohim and YHWH, aka the Father and Son are “one in essence”, then you have the makings of the Trinity. There’s no need to force the Trinity though because the Bible never says there is one deity. Quite the contrary for anyone who actually read the Bible. YHWH doesn’t even prohibit the worship of other gods in the first commandment - he just says not to put those other gods “before him” or on a higher level of importance.
This post was edited on 4/23/24 at 1:13 pm
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
726 posts
Posted on 4/23/24 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Switching gears a little because if I made a new thread it would be deleted or anchored.

No doubt! This one has been. I’m ok with it, at this point, because I think we’ll have a better conversation with some privacy and less distractions.


quote:

Have you ever thought Genesis 19:24 sounded funny? Why does it say the LORD twice. Seems very awkward and redundant.

It does marginally pique my interest.

Your post has a lot of content. Content that I am not educated enough to provide a suitable response to. I will say, that I like Heiser. I think he meant well, but, I’ve read that he gets a lot of his interpretations and consequent theology from the inter-testamental writings (and maybe apocryphal and pseudepigraphal?). I don’t have a problem with the divine council, etc, but I haven’t seen anything by him that lends credence to any of the gnostic theories you espouse. Marcion, and the like, were thoroughly refuted by Irenaeus in the second century. Forgive me for not being knowledgeable enough to swiftly respond to your impressive barrage of claims. Maybe slow down for me, and let’s take it one claim at a time, and then see if we can tie it all together.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram