Started By
Message

re: Why the O-T hate over tattoos?

Posted on 4/12/24 at 6:53 am to
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79409 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 6:53 am to
TBH it’s increasingly a self selecting thing.

So many people have tattoos that being un-tattoed is a shortcut to more affluent, well-bred people. It’s not universal that tatted people aren’t, or that non people are those things, but the correlation is pretty strong for those without at this point.

That said - it’s regional too. In my area you will very rarely find a 20s something wholesome female from a good family, etc. with tattoos. But i have met somewhat surprisingly normal women like that with tattoos from elsewhere.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55946 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 7:09 am to
quote:

That said - it’s regional too. In my area you will very rarely find a 20s something wholesome female from a good family, etc. with tattoos. But i have met somewhat surprisingly normal women like that with tattoos from elsewhere.

idk. a lot of young professional women/former srat girl types in Dallas had a tiny tattoo or two on their wrist, ankle, etc.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72238 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 7:11 am to
quote:

So many people have tattoos that being un-tattoed is a shortcut to more affluent, well-bred people. It’s not universal that tatted people aren’t, or that non people are those things, but the correlation is pretty strong for those without at this point.
This.

Also, it essentially improves nothing.

Scruffy has never heard anyone ever say, “she would be perfect if only she had a tattoo”.

The opposite? Scruffy has heard that many times.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram