Started By
Message

re: Could Judge Ito have ordered a directed verdict, or set aside the jury's decision?

Posted on 4/11/24 at 10:22 pm to
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
26044 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 10:22 pm to
Usually, once a criminal verdict has been rendered a judge may not overrule the verdict.

In the case of OJ Simpson, I feel the same way as I did at the time: the state did not meet their burden of proof. Beyond that, it doesn't matter what I think.

I watched every minute of the trial that was televised, initially to see F. Lee Bailey, Barry Scheck, and Alan Dershowitz work but in the end came away far more impressed with the work of Johnnie Cochran. Bailey's cross was solid but not up to his legendary status and Scheck was far too boring for my tastes. I wish there had been a jury cam so you could see the moment that they made up their minds.
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
18871 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 10:33 pm to
California and most jurisdictions allow a criminal defendant to file a motion to set aside a conviction for certain reasons, but I’ve never heard of a motion by the prosecutor to set aside an acquittal. There would likely be Double Jeopardy issues with that. When a jury says not guilty, that’s it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram