- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Here is the current biggest POS in this country
Posted on 4/9/24 at 8:14 am to Geekboy
Posted on 4/9/24 at 8:14 am to Geekboy
quote:
They are not INTENTIONALLY being crue
Baw... you ever seen a cat play with its still living prey?
Or dolphins? Or Orca?
Yes they can be and often are.
quote:
They don’t get to go to stores and buy meat like you and me.
They don't need to, they just go and cruelly murder livestock, which I don't see your panties wadded over.
This post was edited on 4/9/24 at 8:21 am
2
Posted on 4/9/24 at 8:18 am to fr33manator
Giving wolves will literally slaughter a hundred plus herd of calves or sheep and not eat any of them, it proves to me how lost this kid is.
Just trying to figure out what part of the moral High Ground is trying to take here, is he okay with the guy killing the wolf if he did it immediately? And even then did he have to shoot it, or could he stab it to death, and that would be okay?
Or is his reasoning slightly more logical and he just hates the fact that maybe the animal was injured and suffering, which I think most people could get behind?
Or is he just like full-blown psycho and thinks that the wolf was embarrassed by being brought for a beer before he was killed?
Just trying to figure out what part of the moral High Ground is trying to take here, is he okay with the guy killing the wolf if he did it immediately? And even then did he have to shoot it, or could he stab it to death, and that would be okay?
Or is his reasoning slightly more logical and he just hates the fact that maybe the animal was injured and suffering, which I think most people could get behind?
Or is he just like full-blown psycho and thinks that the wolf was embarrassed by being brought for a beer before he was killed?
Posted on 4/9/24 at 9:26 am to fr33manator
quote:
They don't need to, they just go and cruelly murder livestock, which I don't see your panties wadded over.
Down arrow for you, frickface.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News