- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marques Brownlee explains the Apple Antitrust lawsuit
Posted on 4/9/24 at 10:20 am to DoubleDown
Posted on 4/9/24 at 10:20 am to DoubleDown
quote:
I might be stretching this discussion some, however, one thing that concerns me is if the Gov't intervenes here. Is it possible that forcing apple to utilize RCS (or whatever) allows Big Gubm't to obtain/spy/etc on people's conversations/messages?
As it stands right now, RCS universal profile aka the standard is much easier to spy on people. It's not encrypted. Apple will not use stock Universal Profile, but make their own fork that is compatible with it and should add encryption. Google has their own fork called Jibe that pretty much everyone in the US is using right now because the carriers don't give a shite about it.
There will be some things when Apple's version comes out that will not be compatible with each other for sure, but all the universal profile included things should work between each other.
The government really isn't forcing anything at this point because Apple was already working on integrating RCS this year. These public statments going after Apple about this is perplexing. Especially when the people who should be doing this, the carriers, could easily make it part of their requirements and force Apple's hand to be part of their networks.
This post was edited on 4/9/24 at 10:24 am
Posted on 4/9/24 at 10:38 am to Dam Guide
quote:The carriers milked SMS for all it was worth then moved on to the next cash cow - data. There's no value left in messaging for the carriers so they damn sure don't want to shoulder the cost.
Especially when the people who should be doing this, the carriers, could easily make it part of their requirements and force Apple's hand to be part of their networks.
Honestly I don't want the carriers nor Google nor Apple nor anyone in charge of "universal" messaging. This is going to sound like some buzzword bandwagon pipe dream shite but I think we need to start moving away from messaging via phone numbers and email addresses and look to blockchain messaging.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News