- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/6/24 at 11:06 am to TigerFan91
quote:
Because literally no one would care if it wasn’t called because similar screens were probably set all game without a whistle
The correct answer is to call the other illegal screens as fouls.
Would people be ok with a game winning shot being completely facilitated by a player tackling the shooter’s defender? No. That is effectively what happened, but people are either just completely biased for wanting a specific team to win.
Also UCONN knows the play was illegal. So they took the chance the ref would choose not to call it and that was their choice. They can not be mad because the correct call was made. They could have either excited the play correctly or ran a different play to get the shot they wanted.
It is like when football offense run a run play and they get caught for an illegal pick play. The offense knows there is a risk they could screw it up, but they do it anyways.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News